ACLU Defends Devil Worshipers

It only makes sense that the ACLU would defend the Wiccans. Both organization serve the same master.

This is old news but I am re-posting it. I had to remove the posting from my archive because Yahoo! News usually "kill" the link to their news after a few days. These links take you to web sites taht don't do that and keep the pages up and running.

Here is the story in a conservative-Christain web site and in Fox News.

Why Does America Support a Fanatical Kingdom of Islamists?

The kingdom in question is Saudi Arabia. Why is America supporting these people? (Or rather thier royal government.) Money, and ill-conceived policies are the most likely answers. Saudi's can come to America and not only do business but express their Islamic religious views. If you want to bring your Bible visiting their country however, or just wear a cross on your necklace - you will get in trouble with their authorities. Yet another example that politics and truth are two categories far removed from each other, as far as upholdig freedom of religion in the international arena by the US is concerned.

European Blogger Cannot Support a Lukewarm Church Position on Islam

Interesting theological and political view on why Chrisitanity is not attractive to this European blogger. A quote from his article The Outcome of Two Cultural Revolutions: While China Turns Christian, Europe Turns Muslim:

My main problem with wholeheartedly supporting the Church is that it is, at
best, lukewarm in defending the West by confronting Islam. If there is such a
thing as evil then Islam is evil. If the Church cannot recognize that, then what
good is it? Give me some determined and armed atheists who fight for their
children’s freedom rather then some lukewarm Christians who engage in dialogue
with Muslims.

And type here the rest of it.

Mandatory Support of Public Display of Perversion for San Diego City Employees

Intersting that can't be a Christian in the US Army but must be a homosexual supporter, or else, in the US (San Diego) Fire Department. The story - here. And type here the rest of it.

US Army Ivestigates Christian Servicemen for Their Faith

Separation of church and state or separation of man and faith? Freedom of religion has been brutally violated in American military. This is intolerable “probing” into the faith of Christian believers in the US Army, whose “ethics violation” is that they are believers in Jesus Christ and share their faith without remorse. While there is no problem accepting homosexuals in the army it is evidently morally reprehensible conduct to be a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Read the report here in San Francisco online newspaper. Read more about this “serious investigation” here, another San Franciscan newspaper.

Boo! People in uniform said that they favor an evangelical Christian organization! We must deal away with this unethical and immoral behavior in the army! How can you believe in Christ and share your faith with other members of the military!? You leave your faith at the gate of the barracks, before you enter!

This is a true separation of “church and state”. An army officer is supposed to say good things only about gays, lesbians, feminists, atheists, Wiccans, and Islamic fundamentalists. Is there anything more horrible than having a Christian say that they are such in the military?! Let’s have the homosexuals and the feminists and the PETA animal lovers/terrorists define our defense strategy and military moral codes. (Note: Not exactly PETA but a smilar radical "animal rights" organziation.)

Sarcasm aside—it is a sad day for the US and its Army when the nation known as the bulwark of freedom of religion, and mainly so because of its Christian roots, begins to persecute Christians for their expression of faith.

Michelle Malkin vs. Bill O'Reilly on Freedom of Speech vs. Muslims' Right to Dominate in America

Michelle Malkin is spot on on this issue. Mr. O'Reilly was way out of line defending the Muslim cause at the expense of free speech and by supporting the personal injustice done to Mr. Shmulevich. Watch the video segment (click the link below).


Link: sevenload.com

Link: sevenload.com

View Ms. Malkin's blog with the original post on the subject (text by "Bryan") here.

Letter of feedback to the Factor:

Mr. O’Reilly,

You were wrong on the debate with Michelle about Shmulevich. Wrong like in VERY WRONG. Michelle was spot on. The so called “hate crimes laws” are a legalese for putting limits on the freedom of speech and freedom of thought. Mr. Shmulevich did not hurt anybody. He expressed his emotion by showing how he feels about a book considered “holy” by certain group of people. This case yet again reveals the double standard and supports the case of an obvious Islamic “soft” take-over strategy against the West and America by impertinent insistence on their “rights” and abusing the legal system here. Even freedom of religion includes the right to disagree with someone else’s religious belief and criticize it. Mr. Shmulevich did just that. This case is yet another concession given to Islamist imperialism right on American soil. Mr. Shmulevich is a victim of a gross injustice and that injustice, fueled by Islamist propaganda, chips away from American freedom.

I didn’t think I’d write to you again but your reaction on this case, defending the Muslims' unjust and unjustified cause, angered me. But, of course, I don’t hate you.

American Syndicated Columnist Under Fire for His Remarks on Islam

In this audio clip Mr. Thomas explains his point of view and why he called Islam a "slow spreading cancer" and the strategy of militiant Islam to subjugated the West:

http://www.brightcove.com/title.jsp?title=1080152255

Or just play the audio file by clicking on the video icon below: